• @HipsterTenZero
    link
    English
    894 months ago

    ancient alchemists popping off in their graves rn

  • @nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    27
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Humanity was not responsible enough with bitcoin to learn how to turn electricity into actual gold. Some nerds going to start setting up Tesla coils in caves soon.

    • @Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      93 months ago

      I mean… actual gold isn’t crazy valuable these days, is it? It’s used in quite a bit of electronics for its corrosion resistance and conductivity IIRC.

      • @jmiller@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        183 months ago

        Gold prices have risen steadily for a long time, partly because of its use in electronics. Over $2500/ounce now. But another quirk of gold is the ease with which we can make very thin coatings of it over other materials, sometimes only a few atoms thick. So it is commonly used, but in very very small amounts per device.

          • @chaogomu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            63 months ago

            The main reason to electroplate things in gold is that corrosion resistance.

            The thinner the coating, the better. Mostly because gold isn’t a very good conductor.

            Copper is one of the best conductors available. But the corrosion is the problem. It’s nonconductive.

            Also a fun fact. Stainless steel is a better conductor than gold. But gold is slightly easier to use in electroplating.

            • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              63 months ago

              I think you might want to do a little digging in your undergrad science books:

              The units of electrical conductivity are measured in siemens per meter (S/m). Here’s the electrical conductivity of a few metals:

              Stainless Steel: 1.0 - 1.5 × 10^6 S/m
              Aluminum: 3.77 × 10^7 S/m
              Copper: 5.96 × 10^7 S/m
              Gold: 4.52 × 10^7 S/m
              Silver: 6.30 × 10^7 S/m
              

              In this list silver has the highest conductivity, and stainless steel the lowest conductivity.

          • @jmiller@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Well, that is the amount gold that is mined or recycled every year that is used in electronics. The thing is though, a lot of the gold used in electronics is never recovered. So a considerable amount of the gold used in electronics is removed from from circulation in a way the gold in jewelry or bullion or coins isn’t. It isn’t the primary driver of gold’s price increase, but it is a significant factor.

        • @Wanderer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          If someone works out how to make gold cheap. Then the current value of all gold will collapse and there were be a huge supply of shit that’s been covered in dust in a vault for 100 years.

          • @jmiller@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            Very true. Unfortunately, this process just pulls gold from dilute sources and gathers it into nuggets, from small ones to very very large. No gold is being made new though, that would be great.

  • @shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    234 months ago

    Okay, for a second, I thought that somebody had figured out how to make gold in a lab, which would then obviously bring down the price dramatically, because it would no longer be a super precious metal.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      253 months ago

      We can make gold in a lab, it has been done. Let us just say there is a reason those who want $$$$ to build another super collider are not talking about making gold in them.

    • @barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 months ago

      We’ve known how to turn lead into gold for ages, you just add a couple of protons, neutrons, and electrons. Long story short: Uses a fuckton of energy, not worth it.

      Fun fact: When Ernest Rutherford and colleagues put together the first paper about their findings they avoided the word “transmutation” like the plague. It has been considered impossible since before alchemy became chemistry and even though he was publishing in physics chemists would probably still have had his head.

        • @barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Nuclear energy is more expensive than renewable so not really, no. Having a good combination of starting materials to minimise the amount of energy you need to fuse everything together, or even starting out with something heavier, would be the way to go.

          For more details ask a nuclear physicist of which I’m not one. Honestly there doesn’t seem to be much work on it.