It’s not round, but it’s not flat either!

Integrated development environment, or a glorified code editor. Your welcome for introducing you to the phobia.

I am glued to my IDE more often than not, including weekends. Lemmy is my little respite to get a random sampling of posts on all kinds of topics. Don’t get me wrong, I think AI generated images are pretty fascinating. It’s just that some can trigger a trypophobia type response with their eerie realism.

I really wish these nightmare fuel AI images were tagged NSFW.

The Sony Mavica FD91 was the first digital camera I ever owned! I used it the last couple years of high school and during a short homestay in Japan. You could pick up a giant box of 3.5" floppies for cheap, and as long as you fed it a stead supply of batteries it worked pretty well.

Here are some photos I took that are at, I believe, the highest quality setting (1024 x 768 and about 170kb each). Though I think Lemmy shows them shrunk down in the feed, if you open the image in a new tab you can see the full resolution.

Zoomed in.

And a closeup.

The 14x optical zoom was pretty amazing back then.

I’m really bad at arithmetic so it took me two years to do the calculations, but the math does check out.

Can they add a little speaker and have it play some smooth jazz when unzipping?

I feel like even AI will be able to emulate this kind of speech, but the upside is people with dementia won’t feel so alienated anymore.

Randall Munroe has joined the conversation

I just got back from visiting my parents who were struggling to fix an unreliable dishwasher that keeps clogging, fails to dry, stinks, etc. This is PERFECT timing for that video!

A similar machine also plays a role in the 1997 movie Contact.

Hewn

Am I a psychopath for preferring to use a pen, even if it means I have to cross things out every now and then?

That headline got me really excited before I realized they meant “in an app”.

In hopes that I can generate a sentence that no LLM has ever trained on before, “Extravagant paperclips contemplating stationary pomegranates spilling yellow sensibility.”

If this was filmed in the late sixties using an older orthicon camera it might be an artifact of the way that the image is produced.

I’m just going from memory, but I believe the tubes used a brightness-amplifying screen kept charged with electrons that, when struck by light, would result in a brighter image that could be scanned by a beam. The downside of this technique is that a very bright area would suck up electrons from around it faster than they could recharge, resulting in a dark halo.

I think I remember some of the oldest classic Doctor Who episodes has this visual artifact, as well as some old Beatles TV recordings.