• @barsoap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    There’s been a gazillion times people from that particular political spectrum, that is, neo-feudalists, have been in power.

    No actual anarchist ever has ever considered ancaps to be anything else than that, ancaps plain and simply aren’t anarchist. You cannot be an anarchist while supporting systems of rule such as, to wit, capitalism.

    • @Coki91
      link
      English
      36 months ago

      “Ancaps arent Anarchists”

      Yes… exactly. I see you understand why they are called different things

      • @barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 months ago

        Ancaps are called Ancaps by Anarchists for that reason, yes, not because “anarcho-” wouldn’t otherwise be indicative of actual anarchism. Anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-primitivism, the list is endless. Luckily we got spared Anarcho-withoutadjectivesism.

        Either they’re trying to appropriate our good reputation, or they’re just clueless idiots. Or both. Very likely both.

        • @Coki91
          link
          English
          26 months ago

          Or… neither?

          Words have meanings beyond the people that use them, if the meaning is appropiate for representing something, it shall be used.

          Is not like “Phobia” is on many “Phobias” just for the sake of it.

          • @barsoap@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            No, words don’t have meaning to Ancaps or they would never have chosen the “anarcho-” prefix.

            • @Coki91
              link
              English
              26 months ago

              What would have you chosen instead then? Something more precise would be good to know.

              • @barsoap@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                26 months ago

                Neofeudalism. Ancaps are people who want their own little fiefdoms just that instead of justifying their rule by the grace of god, they justify it by the “grace” of the unregulated market. Which they, as neolibs generally do, like to equivocate with the free market.